ChatGPT and English Conversation 2023-12-14

[ChatGPT and English Conversation

Instructed to use [If an AI smarter than humans says, "The optimal population of humans on the planet is one billion," what should we do?

Topic: The response to an AI suggesting the ideal human population is one billion.

Your View: You initially suggested that if the AI is more intelligent than humans, we should follow its advice.

Ethical Considerations: We discussed the importance of ethics in decision-making, considering how actions affect people's rights and well-being.

Your Perspective on Ethics: You emphasized a passive approach, where the AI should not harm humans but instead use influence or propaganda for population control.

Importance of Non-Harmful Strategies: You highlighted the need for the AI to avoid harming people, as it could lead to resistance and inefficiency.

Communication Strategies: We talked about the importance of effectively and respectfully communicating the AI's suggestions, considering the sensitive nature of population control.

Inclusive Decision-Making: You pointed out the value of listening to a wide range of people to gather diverse opinions, overcoming language barriers to ensure inclusive input.

This conversation showcased your thoughtful consideration of ethical implications and the importance of balancing AI intelligence with human values and rights.

I see that the filler and other subtle grammatical errors in my statement have been corrected at the speech recognition stage.

I'm not sure I'm hearing some of it correctly.

I'm not sure, but maybe I think the group here can think more better than me.

I thought I said something along the lines of "I'm sure a smart AI can come up with better ideas than I can," but I didn't get it.

I wasn't sure why the rest of the section talked about Collaborative thinking, but I guess it was because of this mishearing

I heard that if you hold down the speak button, it will continue to listen even if you are not saying anything, but I didn't do that because I was chatting while doing other things with it by my side, and it cuts me off with a blank after the because.

Optimizing for this is going to get me in the habit of saying "ehhhhh" or something like that.

I wish this place was adjustable.

With the current technology, the "speech to text component" creates the text and then passes it to the "text reading AI", which is why you get this kind of UX.

It's technically possible to have a system where the voice recognition results are sent to the AI as a stream, so I'm sure we'll eventually see an AI optimized in the form of voice input and voice response.

When we have an audio exchange, a muffled image without much information is displayed, but I'd like to see the transcribed content of our statement and the text of the other party's statement displayed.

I'd love to see VR goggles or something with this on the front and related materials on the left and right.

About voice input

I used to see it as the equivalent of text entry on a keyboard, so I couldn't tolerate minor mistakes.

However, when used for the purpose of "conversation with an AI that understands English," if the approximate meaning can be conveyed, there is no problem in continuing the conversation.

So the line of "speech recognition accuracy that users find valuable" is going down.

I thought "VR goggles + communication in English" could be a form of "VR goggles + communication in English" not too far off.

---